I have been arguing with people on facebook for the past week about this…and I finally convinced a friend of mine how his opinion actually impacts real people. As an African-American, it hurts to know that we really haven’t come as far as we’d like to think…and yet it’s obvious why.
1. The religious claim ownership over the term “marraige”
First, a “friend” on facebook got a discussion going about how disappointed he was in that prop 2 was passed in Florida. It was truly disgusting and I agree that that these votes are indicative of how we took a step forward, but a few backward. Proposition 2 banned gay marraige. Floridians voted to “define marriage as the union of one man and one woman as husband and wife, no other legal union is valid or recognized.” As such, the more than 1,000 rights afforded to heterosexual couples will not be afforded homosexual couples.
Several people involved in this discussion (who were actually Muslim) argued that a) marraige was a religious term and non-heterosexuals could have the same rights, just not the same name. If you think if kind of sounds like the Jim Crow days, you’re right. But ’separate but equal’ didn’t work then and it doesn’t work now. Whether it’s on a bench, water fountain or paper, separate never means equal. One group, the majority that defines the collective thinking, will always be held higher than the minority.
Furthermore, “marraige” is not now nor has it even been solely a religious term– not Jewish, not Catholic, not Muslim. Marraige was in the English language long before it was brought into religion. If you read the bible, marraige is not initially used to define the relationship between a man and woman. It was not until the 1600s that the term was instituted into Catholic doctrine. And even then, it was not set in stone. Words are letters put together that can be defined and redefined and it is up to us to do so.
Another person argued that redefining the term after it had already been established to define the relationship between a man and woman would mean pushing our views on others. HA! Doesn’t passing a proposition banning your fellow Americans from being able to enjoy the same rights you have been privileged enough to enjoy constitute pushing your views onto others?!?!
2. We never recognize our own privileges
It is always difficult for any individual or group to recognize its own privileges…or discriminatory practices. A close friend tried for an hour to convince me that their personal opinion that homosexuality was wrong had absolutely no bearing or impact on other people. It was his personal opinion and he was not passing judgment…BUT as far as my friend was concerned, people that “choose” to be homosexual give up their right to have children and so, shouldn’t be allowed to marry or adopt. My friend argued that this view was not based on religion and that he was not against any particular sexual acts…if they were between a woman and a man. “It’s biology,” they argued. Men and women can procreate and homosexual couples cannot. But my friend openly admitted that had he lived in California, he would have noted no on prop 8. It may be clear to the rest of us how blatantly contradictory my friend’s statements are, but these things are not always easy to recognize in ourselves. To ban someone from exercising the same rights that you have is a blatant judgment….and one that has a far-reaching impact.
People continually say “it’s different” when it comes to a comparison of Jim Crow racism and the discrimination against the LGBT community today, but it’s not and it will never be. It is easy to champion your own struggle while downplaying that of another group. But rights are rights and when we deny one group the same rights we have– for whatever reason (excuse) we can come up with– the outcome is still the same…one group still exercises power/control/dominance over another.
And this is even more of a concern for Blacks Latinos. Our support of these propositions is a symptom of a larger problem. And one that is really hurting our communities. Because of pervasive homophobia and avoidance of such issues, AIDS is extremely high in our communities.
As a court advocate for D.C.’s foster care system, my focus is also on the impact of children. Banning a particular group from adopting will directly impact hundreds of needy children. Who will explain to them why loving couples were turned away when they needed a home, love and attention?